Two 100-year anniversaries; Two sinking ships

For someone who is interested in history, facts, figures, and dates, I am actually rather poor at remembering anniversaries**.  For example, I completely missed the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic (until seeing the articles pop up in my Reader), but if you'd asked me last Sunday when they Titanic sank, I could have told you April 15, 1912, and then immediately worked out that it was the 100th anniversary.  


The Titanic is of somewhat special interest to me because (according to Grandpa Rush), one of my ancestors, Rev. Kirkland, was one of those lost.  Now, I don't know if Grandpa had all his facts straight, but it was still good enough for me to make the good reverend the centerpiece of my sophomore year of high school genealogy  project -- a piece of short fiction called "Futility II" in homage to Morgan Robertson's novella.  While that story was composed on a computer (an Apple IIe, using the Incredible Jack word processor), the 5.25" disk is long gone... though I do have my graded hardcopy.


The other 100-year anniversary I did hear about in time to "celebrate", if from afar, was the opening of Fenway Park, a mere 5 days after the sinking of the Titanic (the Wikipedia article notes that coverage of the Titanic overshadowed coverage of the opening of the park).  Fenway itself, however, is not the other sinking ship, though it plays host to the 2012 Red Sox, who have hit the bottom of the ever-more competitive AL East.  While they should soon catch up to Baltimore, they have a lot of work to do to move into third.


** with the exception of that of my own wedding

Philip Hoff: How Red Turned Blue in the Green Mountain State

Seven Days published a review of this Philip Hoff biography that made me want to read it (sadly, I can't link to the review because neither google nor the Seven Days website can find it.  shame on you, Seven Days).  


At any rate, Hoff was elected governor of Vermont in 1962; the first from the Democrat party in over 100 years.  During his six year tenure (the VT gov is elected to two-year terms), the state underwent great social, political, and economic changes.  Blah, blah, woof, woof.  Normally I don't go in for biographies, but this one is charmingly Vermont-y.


For example, in talking about Hoff's first legislative session as a VT House Rep,  

Hoff, who represented more than 35,000 voters, was seated next to Representative William Jay Smith, a Democrat from Pownal, who represented about 1,500 voters.  Sitting close by was Ethel Eddy, a Republican of Stratton, who represented just 24.  (pg27)

The text then goes on to mention that Smith "was a poet and professor of English at Williams" and gives a great quote comparing the Vermont House to the British House of Lords.  What's never mentioned is that William Jay Smith was the 19th poet laureate of the United States.  Oh, yeah, that Smith fella, the rep from Pownal.  Oh, he taught some down at Williams.  Good school, I hear.  Lordy lordy.


Related to the quote above, the authors spend a godawful amount of energy talking about reapportionment as if it was Hoff's gift to VT, and having vapors over how "a House majority could be achieved by representatives from towns that [sic] made up of just 11.5 percent of the state's population".  Well, yeah.  Like how a majority of the United States Senate can be achieved by representatives from states that make up 17% of the country's population (summing half the population of Louisiana, plus the 25 less populous states, and dividing by the total). The Vermont legislature was simply flipped so that the Senate was proportional to population.  Reapportionment was federally mandated, and while I see the argument for requiring unicameral legislatures to be apportioned by population, I really don't see how federally mandating that both bodies of a bicameral legislature to be apportioned by population isn't a violation of states' rights.


There's a section on civil rights issues during Hoff's governorship, and now I want to read Civil Rights in the Whitest State; we continue to face many of these issues today.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Camp (series 2, book 1)

Percy is back, and he's got a whole new set of banisters!**


Well, sort of.  It's the same world as the original Percy Jackson series, but this book focuses on three new heroes.  Sarah insists that Rick is a better writer, but I suspect that maybe our level has been set, we know what to expect, and Riordan delivers on that promise.  There will be strongly-drawn characters whom we like (the main heroes).  There will be annoying minor characters (usually a satyr).  There will a prophecy that foreshadows some long-range plotting in a great way for the YA crowd.  There will be some good conversations between the demigods and their parents that are good character-building exercises, and reveal a bit more about the long-range plotting.  There will be a thrilling final battle.


And... there will a bunch of haphazard episodic scenes to get us from the prophecy to the final battle, each of which has, at best, a tenuous relationship to the overall plot.  Sigh.  More problematic, for me, is the mis-characterization of Midas and Medea as among the worst evildoers in Tartarus.  Midas might have made some mistakes, but was otherwise a good citizen.  Medea is a complex and tragic figure who perhaps took vengeance against Jason too far, and not a simple villain.


It's still perfectly fun fantasy, I was entertained, and will be reading book 2.




** I'm paraphrasing Don King, talking about Mike Tyson's new lawyers?  Anyone?  Bueller?  (yes, this is to further underscore that I'm not the demographic Riordan is writing for)